Nightmare by Steven Stahlberg
This image was the Art of the Day for 2026-09-23
3
Posts
Simply amazing!!
Great dramatic tension here. *mumbles something unintelligible about the bloodsucking medical profession*
indeed...
..great!
° thisign °
° thisign °
love it.
very nice colors, I haven't seen anything this good for months... now im thinking: "what techniques is he using, what app and where the hell is the complete tutorial for this pict?"
I also found myself thinking: "I so need a Wacom"
I also found myself thinking: "I so need a Wacom"
What a
leg.. grr, hehe ;) love it again you do the most amazing stuff, and then I have to ask you if you know when your virtual actress will be all done? And what you are going to do with it??..
//Erik
//Erik
Re: What a
looks a bit like gecko... hehe ;) just kidding
Thanks
everybody.
Ronnlund, I used PS and a Wacom as you suspected, I have no tutorial (you're the first to ask about that so far), :)
Mini-tutorial: I simply started sketching in b&w in PS, without reference, to get this idea down ASAP before it evaporated... then I just kept going, with hardedged pressure sensitive brushes of varying sizes, until I had a fairly complete black & white image. Which I then colored at a later stage, using layers (set to 'color' or 'normal' usually). Then I went back and forth, erasing on some layers, adding on others, until it got so complex I collapsed it. I also extensively cut and paste regions, then scaling, rotating or distorting them (because I never get the proportions right from the start).
DigitalCarver, my virtual characters will never be 'finished' like a sculpture or painting is, but at least she's ready for production now. It's like a software - I just keep coming out with new and better versions. I'm up to version 4.0 now.
What will I do with her? Good question, actually producing anything except still images takes a lot of money and time, so I guess I just have to wait until the right project comes along. Meanwhile I try to make some stills, whenever I have time between the R&D and other stuff.
Ronnlund, I used PS and a Wacom as you suspected, I have no tutorial (you're the first to ask about that so far), :)
Mini-tutorial: I simply started sketching in b&w in PS, without reference, to get this idea down ASAP before it evaporated... then I just kept going, with hardedged pressure sensitive brushes of varying sizes, until I had a fairly complete black & white image. Which I then colored at a later stage, using layers (set to 'color' or 'normal' usually). Then I went back and forth, erasing on some layers, adding on others, until it got so complex I collapsed it. I also extensively cut and paste regions, then scaling, rotating or distorting them (because I never get the proportions right from the start).
DigitalCarver, my virtual characters will never be 'finished' like a sculpture or painting is, but at least she's ready for production now. It's like a software - I just keep coming out with new and better versions. I'm up to version 4.0 now.
What will I do with her? Good question, actually producing anything except still images takes a lot of money and time, so I guess I just have to wait until the right project comes along. Meanwhile I try to make some stills, whenever I have time between the R&D and other stuff.
Now this is what we all lack
REAL art
Art that is sharing an EMOTION of some kind.
I am so whole-heartedly FED UP with all fantasy-crap and boring manga.
Neat art that is nothing but neat.
Art that is totally dead.
This drawing has caught the horror perfectly, and I'm impressed.
If it only had been painted in REAL colours and not in Photoshop, it'd have been perfect.
Photoshop ought to be banned on the art scene.
Art that is sharing an EMOTION of some kind.
I am so whole-heartedly FED UP with all fantasy-crap and boring manga.
Neat art that is nothing but neat.
Art that is totally dead.
This drawing has caught the horror perfectly, and I'm impressed.
If it only had been painted in REAL colours and not in Photoshop, it'd have been perfect.
Photoshop ought to be banned on the art scene.
Re: Photoshop not equal to Real Art
oooooooookay...
Re: Now this is what we all lack
Looks like someone paid a visit to Elfwood... As for photoshop being banned from the art scene, you've got a lot of nerves saying that around here. Not everyone is made of money and can go out and buy expensive oils, canvas, and paintbrushes... and have their own studio so they don't slop that crap aroud...
Re: Now this is what we all lack
Not only is the digital medium cheaper in the long run, but it's really it's very own media. It's got its own properties, just like traditional media. And certain effects distinguish it just like watercolours and oils and acrylics are distinguished one from another.
(I know I've said this before, but watercolour was once considered to be a sketch medium only--certainly not suitable for real artists. It seems that much digital work has now moved into the "not suitable for real artists" category that watercolour once occupied....but only in the minds of narrowminded art snobs.)
The same skills needed to paint well digitally are the same skills you need to paint well traditionally. Only the media is different. If you can't paint or draw in real life, it will be hard for you to create anything really neat digitally. It's not as if the computer does all the work or most of the work. The artist is still the catalyst.
(I know I've said this before, but watercolour was once considered to be a sketch medium only--certainly not suitable for real artists. It seems that much digital work has now moved into the "not suitable for real artists" category that watercolour once occupied....but only in the minds of narrowminded art snobs.)
The same skills needed to paint well digitally are the same skills you need to paint well traditionally. Only the media is different. If you can't paint or draw in real life, it will be hard for you to create anything really neat digitally. It's not as if the computer does all the work or most of the work. The artist is still the catalyst.
Re: Now this is what we all lack
Thanks for the praise!
But I don't agree with what you wrote about real colors and PS, I think red is red, no matter wether it's painted, printed, or on a screen. In fact I'm not very likely to ever see the 'real' paint unless I go to a museum. Then we have the effects of time on real paint...
The future belongs to the digital - screens will become a better medium than mere physical paint, able to reproduce a wider gamut. One day I think we'll have screens we can hang, as paintings or posters.
But I don't agree with what you wrote about real colors and PS, I think red is red, no matter wether it's painted, printed, or on a screen. In fact I'm not very likely to ever see the 'real' paint unless I go to a museum. Then we have the effects of time on real paint...
The future belongs to the digital - screens will become a better medium than mere physical paint, able to reproduce a wider gamut. One day I think we'll have screens we can hang, as paintings or posters.
Re: Re: Now this is what we all lack
First of all, nice work, right freaky :)
You know, you may have a million dollar idea with the screens.. that would be one heck of a way to throw a digital art show at a gallery - traditionally frame LCD's with the images on the walls, labelled and spaced all neat and proper. It would really say something about the way digital medium is changing the world of "art" as we know it. Would be an expensive show to throw, but very cool nonetheless.
Regarding the issue of digital media, I don't think that somebody could have said it better than PixelFish. Just because it's digital doesn't mean the tradional rules don't apply (and that those rules can't be broken either).
We are just so saturated with digitally created work these days that we really take it for granted-- alot of that is to blame on the media of course. It's interesting to see ANSi amongst the other works in the artpacks here because it makes you look back and see how far the medium itself has progressed, and to respect how advanced the stuff we use these days is. Have you ever popped a DVD into your player and actually looked at it to think how advanced that shit really is, regardless of whether you know how it works or not? And it's just as common as a tape deck was in the 80's.
On the subject (or wandering off of it), I would put a strong recommendation to watch Macross Plus parts 1-4. Yes, it's anime but it holds against all your big hollywood productions (one hell of a soundtrack), with alot more thought. After watching that, think about how it reflects on the media, technology and whether we control technology or is it controlling us? That movie is genius.
I'm WAY rambling here but you sparked the thought. Sorry for killing bandwidth :)
You know, you may have a million dollar idea with the screens.. that would be one heck of a way to throw a digital art show at a gallery - traditionally frame LCD's with the images on the walls, labelled and spaced all neat and proper. It would really say something about the way digital medium is changing the world of "art" as we know it. Would be an expensive show to throw, but very cool nonetheless.
Regarding the issue of digital media, I don't think that somebody could have said it better than PixelFish. Just because it's digital doesn't mean the tradional rules don't apply (and that those rules can't be broken either).
We are just so saturated with digitally created work these days that we really take it for granted-- alot of that is to blame on the media of course. It's interesting to see ANSi amongst the other works in the artpacks here because it makes you look back and see how far the medium itself has progressed, and to respect how advanced the stuff we use these days is. Have you ever popped a DVD into your player and actually looked at it to think how advanced that shit really is, regardless of whether you know how it works or not? And it's just as common as a tape deck was in the 80's.
On the subject (or wandering off of it), I would put a strong recommendation to watch Macross Plus parts 1-4. Yes, it's anime but it holds against all your big hollywood productions (one hell of a soundtrack), with alot more thought. After watching that, think about how it reflects on the media, technology and whether we control technology or is it controlling us? That movie is genius.
I'm WAY rambling here but you sparked the thought. Sorry for killing bandwidth :)
Re: Re: Now this is what we all lack
Sony makes digital picture frames... you can set the photos to do a slide show as well as show just one thing. You could just as easily make it display a drawing. The drawback of course is that they're hideously expensive, and I think so far they're not very big.
Re: Now this is what we all lack
Saying that probably proves that you are not an artist in any medium. I've painted a lot of digital art and only recently started painting with oil on a real canvas, and I must say that I think it's easier.
The pencil become more of an extension of yourself and your not clogged with all the tools you have to use in a computer. Creating good computer art does not only take to be a great artist, but also be able to use a very advanced tool.
Stupid people have always tried to claim new mediums are not art. And when I say stupid people, I mean stupid people. Like you. Photographs was once considered "not art" but is accepted as art now. The only thing that defines art is that it is an artist that creates it.
They are just different mediums you know, both with their respective pro's and con's. When I draw in oil, I mostly miss the undo buttons and the abillity to change the whole picture saturation etc. When I draw on the computer, I miss the feeling of the canvas, the feel of the brush, and the whole feeling of reallity.
The pencil become more of an extension of yourself and your not clogged with all the tools you have to use in a computer. Creating good computer art does not only take to be a great artist, but also be able to use a very advanced tool.
Stupid people have always tried to claim new mediums are not art. And when I say stupid people, I mean stupid people. Like you. Photographs was once considered "not art" but is accepted as art now. The only thing that defines art is that it is an artist that creates it.
They are just different mediums you know, both with their respective pro's and con's. When I draw in oil, I mostly miss the undo buttons and the abillity to change the whole picture saturation etc. When I draw on the computer, I miss the feeling of the canvas, the feel of the brush, and the whole feeling of reallity.
very oily... and scary!
I love this one! Its using photoshop like the alternative art medium it truly is!
whats the point in getting covered in oil paint and turps when you can bash out a corker like this with no mess at all, except maybee a wacom indent in your first finger!
whats the point in getting covered in oil paint and turps when you can bash out a corker like this with no mess at all, except maybee a wacom indent in your first finger!
oua...ou!
Tetoia kaneis , Gogaki?
ou.oou..u.u , Lucky Philip!
ou.oou..u.u , Lucky Philip!
Wow !!!
Amazing !!
pulp_fiction.blogspot.com
pulp_fiction.blogspot.com
very, very nice
Excellent work, and right in line with my current fascination with vampires. I've been watching nothing but crappy 80's horror movies recently, and a nurse vampire is quite wicked. :)
Re: very, very nice
If you're into Vampires and nurse vampires and the like, try watching "Blood - The Last Vampire". It's a killer 1/2 hour manga.. great mood, animation and tons of blood, unfortunately it feels majorly unfinished.. but what is there is quite excellent.
Whoa
Geez, I ain't gonna sleep for at least a week from now on, and it's all your fault!
wow!!!
it`s terrible!!!!!
UNDERWEAR
does she have red underwear on? hmm...=/ just a thought...my girlfriend pointed that one out...=D
..
...
....
..
...
....
=-0
This is simply Amazing. The idea is completely original!
Just...
...totally wicked!!!